Comments on: Curly W Tattoo?! http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/ Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:22:44 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: ryan http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-5961 ryan Thu, 25 Dec 2008 04:15:26 +0000 http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/#comment-5961 It says I am DC. It says I am DC.

]]> By: Hot Tattoo Designs http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-2097 Hot Tattoo Designs Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:28:00 +0000 http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/#comment-2097 Good job of research. Thanks for the informative post. Good job of research. Thanks for the informative post.

]]> By: Jenny http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1903 Jenny Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:05:52 +0000 http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/#comment-1903 Sweet Tatoo. Sweet Tatoo.

]]> By: 6th and D http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1750 6th and D Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:41:41 +0000 http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/#comment-1750 It says " I AM DC", the DC being of the interlocked Nats variety. It says ” I AM DC”, the DC being of the interlocked Nats variety.

]]> By: kevin rusch http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1740 kevin rusch Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:46:36 +0000 http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/#comment-1740 I think he likes Walgreens. I think he likes Walgreens.

]]> By: Links 07.11.08 - Links Before Drinks « the east coast bias http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1705 Links 07.11.08 - Links Before Drinks « the east coast bias Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:44:43 +0000 http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/#comment-1705 [...] in to the Nationals game in the DC area? DAMN. They’ll be moving to Vegas in no time. Unless Beasley’s curly W tattoo has some say about it (h/t to [...] […] in to the Nationals game in the DC area? DAMN. They’ll be moving to Vegas in no time. Unless Beasley’s curly W tattoo has some say about it (h/t to […]

]]> By: Ian http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1685 Ian Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:58:27 +0000 http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/#comment-1685 Whatever the legal interpretations, I just think it's pretty badass. You'll never see an actual National sport a tat like that! Whatever the legal interpretations, I just think it’s pretty badass. You’ll never see an actual National sport a tat like that!

]]> By: Justin http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1662 Justin Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:31:41 +0000 http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/#comment-1662 I think it says "Fam" to the left of the DC. He's from DC, so, family = DC = Washington. I think it says “Fam” to the left of the DC. He’s from DC, so, family = DC = Washington.

]]> By: JoeFan http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1659 JoeFan Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:10:04 +0000 http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/#comment-1659 All you commenters are f-ing tools. All you commenters are f-ing tools.

]]> By: Muffy http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/comment-page-1/#comment-1656 Muffy Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:20:37 +0000 http://wevegotheart.com/2008/07/08/curly-w-tattoo/#comment-1656 Tread lightly, possible first amendment protection. The artist may argue that the work is sufficiently transformative when viewed in context of Mr. Beasley's canvas (a.k.a. his body). If the same artist who drew the "W", or the variation thereof, as it appears on Mr. Beasley, also drew the rest of the tattoos, his transformative argument may even garner a little more persuasive strength. (Not a very persuasive agrument) He would argue that this restraint creates a chilling effect. The only chilling the supreme court wants to do is keeping the bottle Mad Dog 20/20 on ice after a landmark decision. Maybe MLB should procure a tattoo licensee. Now, this is where the MBA's step in and say "Any exposure is good exposure, maybe Beasley fans will go out and buy Nationals' gear. This is an amazing and most importantly 'FREE' form of advertising." Somebody call the Game and tell him we want our Dodgers Logo back. Holla at that bottom Dolla Tread lightly, possible first amendment protection. The artist may argue that the work is sufficiently transformative when viewed in context of Mr. Beasley’s canvas (a.k.a. his body). If the same artist who drew the “W”, or the variation thereof, as it appears on Mr. Beasley, also drew the rest of the tattoos, his transformative argument may even garner a little more persuasive strength. (Not a very persuasive agrument) He would argue that this restraint creates a chilling effect. The only chilling the supreme court wants to do is keeping the bottle Mad Dog 20/20 on ice after a landmark decision. Maybe MLB should procure a tattoo licensee. Now, this is where the MBA’s step in and say “Any exposure is good exposure, maybe Beasley fans will go out and buy Nationals’ gear. This is an amazing and most importantly ‘FREE’ form of advertising.” Somebody call the Game and tell him we want our Dodgers Logo back.

Holla at that bottom Dolla

]]>